Spurs no Dynasty

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

The American Heritage Dictionary -- as stated by Dictionary.com -- defines dynasty as
1. A succession of rulers from the same family or line.
2. A family or group that maintains power for several generations: a political dynasty controlling the state.

Earlier today I heard someone on the radio say the Spurs would be a dynasty if they won the NBA championship this season. How many in a row would that be for the Spurs? One. People use the term dynasty WAY too loosely and it bothers me.

A dynasty is the Boston Celtics winning 8 titles in a row.

To a lesser extent it's Jordan's Bulls winning three straight titles twice. Any other three-peat is arguable, because repeated titles shows that team maintaining power for several generations (seasons).

If the Spurs win the title this season -- and they probably will -- it will be their fourth title in nine seasons. The Lakers three-peated between the Spurs' championships in 99 and 03.
That's a great feat, it's not a dynasty.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Spurs no Dynasty.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.fresnobeehive.com/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/1322

1 Comments

Hi Dan,
Been a fan since back when you were reporting on college boys field hockey for the Albany Daily Express Times-Gazette.

How do you feel about the 2000's Patriots? 90's Cowboys? 80's Niners? Even the 70's Steelers? Many people call those teams dynasties but none of them ever won more than 2 in a row. Do you propose different dynasty rules for sports?

The only dynasty that I think counts is the Ming Dynasty.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Daniel Lyght published on May 31, 2007 11:54 AM.

Who will sit, Who will play in 2007-08? was the previous entry in this blog.

Indians take Beau Mills with 13th draft pick is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.