Nunes bristles at suggestion he opposes GI Bill

| 7 Comments

The Bee's editorial board was critical of local Republican Congressmen George Radanovich, Devin Nunes and Kevin McCarthy for recently voting against the GI bill while supporting sending American troops to war. We gave the trio a "thumbs down" on Saturday. That angered Nunes and he fired off this response:

This letter is in response to recent reporting by The Fresno Bee, which incorrectly suggests I oppose improved GI Bill benefits for veterans.

In an article printed on May 26, the Bee noted that 256 of my colleagues in the House and 75 U.S. Senators voted for legislation that would provide improvements to the GI Bill. However the paper failed to explain why, given both House and Senate passage of GI bill improvements, no legislation has been sent to the President or will become law.

The answer is simple. Leaders in Congress were not trying to improve benefits for veterans. Instead, they were playing partisan political games in advance of the Memorial Day recess. Improvements to the GI Bill, as well as urgently needed funding for our soldiers in combat, are being held hostage as a result.

This summer 490,000 active duty military troops will face the prospect of no paycheck and 300,000 military families could lose their housing benefits because Congress has not passed a clean war funding bill. Unfortunately, our local paper took the political bait related to GI benefits and missed out on reporting the complete facts.

What really happened? Democrat leaders, with the support of specially created Marshall Law rules, did not allow Congress to vote on clean legislation to improve GI benefits or fund the war. Instead, the speaker tied these issues to massive tax increases on small businesses, an unprecedented increase in unemployment insurance spending and a requirement to withdraw troops from Iraq. Take a look for yourself online at www.thomas.gov – just pull up HR 2642. You will find three votes, as well as the rule linking them together. While it takes a little digging, you will quickly see how the Bee’s reporting was misleading at best.

Last week, I and other Republicans voted for a clean bill to improve GI benefits (Roll Call 364). Only two Democrats voted against their party leaders and supported the proposal. Instead, as we have witnessed for the past two years, most Democrats supported the political exercise of pretending to support veterans and our soldiers, while actually doing nothing for them.

7 Comments

Aahh - the Spin Doctor mounts a defense.

I accept the advise and legislation supported by Veterans and Senators like Webb and Hagel rather than Nunes.

So Nunes voted against the bill that he knew would pass, but voted for a bill that had no chance in order to claim he was in favor of the concept? That sure sounds like political game-playing to me.

..."specially created Marshall Law rules"?

I was wondering the same thing, swift. Does he mean "martial law," perhaps? Or the "Marshall Plan"? Or maybe "Martian law"?

"Marshall Law" -- that confused me also ... I just sent this inquiry to Speaker Pelosi for clarification;

"Congressman Devin Nunes made this statement in a letter to The Fresno Bee;

"What really happened? Democrat leaders, with the support of specially created Marshall Law rules, did not allow Congress to vote on clean legislation to improve GI benefits or fund the war. Instead, the speaker tied these issues to massive tax increases on small businesses, an unprecedented increase in unemployment insurance spending and a requirement to withdraw troops from Iraq."

WHAT are "Marshall Law rules"??

Your prompt response will be appreciated ... as usual Nunes continues to be a minority within a minority.

Thanks,

Eldon W. Thompson
Orange Cove CA

I see Mr. Nunes sent the same complaint to the Bee as a letter to the editor (or someone on his staff did, more likely). Still no explanation of what "Marshall law" is, though.

...marital law?, maritime law?..marsupial paws ?...

Advertisement

Recent Comments

  • swift: ...marital law?, maritime law?..marsupial paws ?... read more
  • Mike D.: I see Mr. Nunes sent the same complaint to the read more
  • Eldon Thompson: "Marshall Law" -- that confused me also ... I just read more
  • Mike D.: I was wondering the same thing, swift. Does he mean read more
  • swift: ..."specially created Marshall Law rules"? read more
  • Mike D.: So Nunes voted against the bill that he knew would read more
  • Eldon Thompson: Aahh - the Spin Doctor mounts a defense. I accept read more

Recent Photos

  • McCain11-04.JPG
  • ashley,jpg.jpg
  • Cheney.jpg
  • STALLONE.JPG
  • arnold mug 10-31.JPG
  • fireplace.jpg
  • PEREA_10-24.jpg
  • PEREA 10-24.JPG
  • Powell.JPG
  • OBAMA.jpg

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jim Boren published on May 28, 2008 6:29 AM.

Isn't it time we do away with outdated two-house California Legislature? was the previous entry in this blog.

Poochigian fires back in increasingly nasty Fresno County Board of Supervisors race is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.