What does this tragedy say about insurance companies?
As the enormity of the damage caused by the Southern California fires began to be understood in the Golden State, California's elected officials started announcing to the public that they would use their authority to ensure that insurance companies did not duck their responsibilities to the state's homeowners.
The only reason they would do that is the insurance companies have a history of not paying off when there are major disasters. Consider the message the elected officials are sending. . . There hasn't been one peep out of the insurance companies about not paying claims, but it is assumed that this industry would not do what they are in business to do. Now that's a lousy reputation preceding you.
First, Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, a Republican, said he would immediately enact emergency regulations so homeowners affected by the Southern California fires are not be prevented by insurance companies from obtaining or renewing their homeowne insurance policies. Then State Sen. Dean Florez, a Democrat, said he would author a bill that would protect homeowners from the insurance companies in future disasters.
The insurance companies haven't yet denied a claim or turned down a homeowner's insurance renewal, but they already are under attack for what everyone expects they will do.

Comments
if they get hit too hard...congress will bail em out.
Posted by: john swift | October 26, 2007 9:30 AM
What it states is the obvious - that insurance companies are in business to make money. They make money by collecting premiums, and by paying as little as possible in claims.
It makes one wonder why we as a society decided to entrust our health care system to a profit-driven industry.
Posted by: Mike D. | October 26, 2007 10:04 AM
I spent much of my legal career suing insurance companies. I can assure you that the scepticism is well deserved. However, I must say that there is another side: comsumer fraud. One wonders how many family heirlooms and precious jewels and furniture items were "in" the homes.
Posted by: Phil Fullerton | October 26, 2007 10:51 AM
What a bunch of horse puckey.No precedent here for your nonsensical comments Curly, Moe and Larry.Just anti-business hog wash.Mike D. would like the government to run everything it appears and we know how well that will work out.Socialist stooge.Phil-how much did you pocket by suing insurance companies.Hypocritcal stooge.Swifty-a conspiracy behind everything.Paranoid stooge.Meanwhile these folks who went through this tragedy will try to rebuild their lives and Big business will help them-not harm them.
Posted by: Brian Murray | October 28, 2007 8:21 AM
"Anti-business hogwash"? Gee, how do I respond to that impeccably well-reasoned rebuttal?
Posted by: Mike D. | October 29, 2007 8:22 AM