THEATER REVIEW: 'Orange Flower Water'
Instead, the play collides the audience with the anger and disillusionment of two festering marriages. This is theater that goes for the jugular. If the caustic wit of a Neil LaBute in "The Mercy Seat" (recently performed by Epic) and the brutal verbal slap fight of an Edward Albee in "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf" are the types of drama that charge your batteries, then the relationship angst of "Orange Flower Water" is aimed at you.
The play, which unfolds in a series of two-person encounters between the four characters, encourages a boxing-ring mentality. (Ding! And the first round goes to .... ) As the scenes -- set mostly in bedrooms -- unfold, the two cast members who aren't on stage at the time hang out at the periphery of the action, always in sight of the audience, as if they have become temporary spectators as well.
For all its promise of high drama and relentless honesty, however, the production remains curiously inert -- or at least less vibrantly throbbing than you'd expect.
Set in a small town in which folks know each other's business, "Orange Flower Water" is the story of Beth (Danielle Jorn), a stay-at-home mom who is unhappily married to the troubled Brad (James Taylor), a mean and abusive video-store proprietor whose dour outlook and short temper makes him hard to live with. She has fallen in love with a local pharmacist, David (Adam Schroeder). When we first meet them, they're about to consummate their affair.
Giving in to their romantic feelings will destroy two marriages. David's wife, Cathy (Erica Johnston), a choir teacher, attributes the growing distance between her and her husband to the inevitable complexities of family life: not enough time, too many commitments. With sets of children on each side, the human toll in terms of emotional upheaval will be high.
Director Janine Christl, who has shown in the past that she's extremely adept at staging intimate, high-voltage dramas, never finds the explosiveness in this show that I think she'd like. In the first scene between David and Beth, for example, something about the writing and staging is miscalibrated. I'd expect a much higher level of sexual tension between two people about to move their relationship forward so irrevocably. The scene seems overly intellectual, as if the characters are engaged in a vigorous classroom debate about ethics and morality rather than making decisions that will affect the rest of their lives. Is this a deficiency of acting, directing or writing? Or is it an amazingly clever device by the playwright (who was a staff writer on the HBO series "6 Feet Under") as he spins a tale in which two unhappy people are simply desperate to get out of unfulfilling relationships? This is one of those cases where I can't even venture to tell, but all I know is that it just didn't seem to work.
Another intensely intimate scene later in the play, between David and Cathy, has the same sluggish feel. It teeters between searing and vacant -- and paced so languidly that its initial force (and even shock) dissipates into a sleepy solemnity.
These are challenging roles for actors. Each one, in his or her own way, wasn't quite ready to tackle them. Schroeder, Johnston and Taylor struggle at times to incorporate their characters' flaws and inconsistencies in believable ways.
There are flashes of solid theatricality, like a scene in which Schroeder and Taylor's characters awkwardly connect while watching their sons playing soccer. Schroeder's reluctant and uncomfortable clapping for the action on the field is in silky contrast to Taylor's menace as he disdainfully plays with his prey like a cat does a mouse.
Jorn comes closest to having a lock on her character -- particularly in a very fine moment in which Beth muses that once you cross the line from dreaming about something to actually committing to it, everything takes on a whole new shade of gray. "Everything actually has to happen, doesn't it?" asks Beth. "You think in your mind things can happen without happening, but in the end, they always have to actually happen."
Austin Frost, who coordinated the sound, pumps up the show with a series of terrific, mood-setting (and often jarring) songs, which often accompany movement by the actors. Even this aural flourish is a little miscalibrated. It's too ornamented. Most of the musical interludes go on far too long, leaving the cast almost dawdling in accompaniment.
"Orange Flower Water" is the last production from Epic Theatre, which Christl is shutting down to focus on other local theater projects. I'm very sorry to see this company go. Even though I didn't quite connect with this particular play, I always knew that an Epic play meant an interesting evening. It was a pleasure getting to know a theater that stages such provocative and challenging fare. Here's hoping similar shows from other companies can continue to follow.


Comments:
i would just like to say that i find it very hard to agree with donald on this, and in fact i have disagreed to almost every review of his this year (except for two shows which i agreed with him almost completely) but i feel Orange Flower Water is an extrodinary show, and maybe the actors are too young to play these roles but they all handeled maturity, age, and sexuality perfectly. and i feel like the story is that of our time. and maybe some of the action at the top of the play and at the end could have gone away but i feel like the actors incorperated those choices almost like they were part of the script, and i don't know maybe they are. and in regards to the scene with the "new" couple i think donald answered his own question, of course it was a "clever device" from the playwright to show that these two people were looking for anyway to get out. they were searching for anything and they ultimatly decide to thow logic out the window and do what feels good. duh. thats what the play is about! in short i whole heartedly disagree with donald, as i said before; and have disagreed with everything he has reviewed in the past year-ish. so don't take his word for it, i say everyone needs to see this amazing show and deciede for themselves. it truely is amazing, and haveing been through a divorce myslef i was right there with the characters the whole time, and i think anyone who has been through a divorce should see this show, the uncanny similarities of human behavior are mind bogelling. great job to the actors and director, and i am going to miss Epic!
Posted by: annonomus at June 16, 2008 11:40 PM
I agree with the person above me. I saw the show and loved it. And yes, also having been through a divorce and all the "fun" that comes with it, it's a truly real show, full with real emotions, real dialogue, and real characters. The cast, while young, handled the material and acting responsibilites superbly. Granted - the sex scene is a bit uncomfortable for some, but that's the point. It's to make the sudience feel uneasy, and it accomplishes that goal. Finely acted by ALL individuals, a well crafted all around play.
If you can make it out this weekend to the final performances - it's well worth the money to see a well acted piece of theater..
Kudos to all involved!
Posted by: Annonymous at June 17, 2008 2:10 PM
I find it troubling that someone might take this review of Orange Flower Water as an indication that this is a show worth missing. Far from it. This play truly moved me and I felt that the actors delivered powerful, turbulent performances.
James Taylor (Brad) could not have left more on that stage unless he had bled. His character was complex and three-dimensional, and I thought he took a role that could easily have been just 'the bad guy’, and made us care about him, which is a commendable accomplishment. Erica Johnston (Cathy) was sincere and compelling and I got no impression at all that she misunderstood her character. I found the intimate scene very touching and tragic and if a scene that takes place in bed is 'languid', is that a bad thing?
Contrarily, I felt that Danielle Jorn (Beth), who was the only actor to receive the dubious compliment of coming ‘closest to having a lock on her character’ in Mr. Munro’s review, actually was a little less connected and showed her age in seeming a bit overwhelmed by the gravity of her character’s situation. But even with a lack of life experience, Jorn is a fantastic actress and serves up several strong moments. The same can be said of Adam Schroeder (David), although his youth manages to work in his favor by lending credit to the childish selfishness of his character.
I encourage you to head to Severance and catch this play before it closes this weekend. And here's hoping that maybe someday in the future, if Janine's schedule ever permits it, Epic Theatre may just be resurrected and re-open its doors with more edgy, conscious plays that deliver such lovely, raw humanity.
Posted by: Gabriela at June 17, 2008 3:10 PM
Post a comment
(read the comment policy before posting)