Apparently, these aren't real photos, they are "computerised 'averaged' facial photographs" -- whatever that means -- and they were released with a study that dealt with how you can tell what a person is interested in based on their facial features. (I think. I dunno, it doesn't link to the study. That's not the point of this blog entry.)

So I'm checking out these "women," because I think it would be good to know if one of them just wants sex or seeking a long-term relationship. And it makes sense. The one on the left is the club girl, and the one on the right is hanging out at Revue.

Except that I misread the caption. It's reversed (btw, who writes captions describing the subject on the right first? The same people who use the word "whilst." Morons, that's who.) So, now I'm racking my brain trying to understand why I still think the one on the left is only interested in, you know.

Is it a mind-association thing? (As in, my mother told me the tooth fairy was real, so it blows my mind that she would lie to a child.) If that's the case, and these faces are interchangeable ... then what's the point of this research?

Garrghh. Btw, Heather, one of the "dudes" looks like Jim Halpert, no?